A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

The land of no second chance Here, sins can remain emblazoned on our job and college applications and sever our access to basic civil rights, in perpetuity. One in every 13 black adults across the country could not vote in this election because of a criminal record, according to the Sentencing Project. And many millions more won't make it past a resume screener because so many employers say that lawbreakers of any stripe "need not apply.

A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

These courts also arose from a growing belief that instead of being "miniature adults", children and adolescents possess moral and cognitive capabilities that are not quite fully developed. This process is controversial, due to concerns about the difference between the cognitive and moral capabilities of juveniles vs.

Supporters of the abolition of juvenile court, however, argue that prosecuting juvenile offenders in criminal court offers better protection to society and holds juveniles responsible for their actions.

One of the most significant differences is the intent of the two systems; the focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation and future reintegration, while the goal of the criminal justice system is punishment and deterrence of future crime.

In juvenile court rulings, decisions often take psychosocial factors into account along with current offense severity and the youth's offense history. In contrast, in criminal proceedings, the severity of the offense and criminal history weigh most heavily in sentencing outcome.

Upon release, those who pass through the juvenile justice system receive parole -like surveillance along with reintegration programs, reflecting the belief that juvenile behavior can be changed.

A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

Those released from prison receive surveillance which serves to monitor and report illegal behavior. Juvenile court judges have the ability to transfer juveniles to criminal court, usually takes into account age and severity of offense Prosecutorial Discretion: Prosecutors have the authority to file cases in juvenile court or criminal court jurisdiction Statutory Exclusion: State laws that require juveniles to be tried in criminal court if any previous crimes were seen in criminal court Twenty-three states have no minimum age in at least one judicial waiver or statutory exclusion provision allowing for the transfer of juveniles to adult court.

In states where a minimum age is specified for all transfer provisions, age 14 is the most common minimum age. Other offenses included property offenses In a study that looked at 1, youths, from ten to 17 years of age, it was found that females, non-Hispanic whites, and younger juveniles were less likely to be tried in criminal court than males, African Americans, Hispanics, and older youths.

When the juveniles who were sentenced in criminal court were compared to the juveniles sentenced in juvenile court, those youth who were sentenced to adult prison had greater odds of having a disruptive behavior disordera substance abuse disorder, or affective and anxiety disorders.

These critics state that the boundary between juvenile and adult is no longer as clear, as children appear to grow up faster, with more exposure to adult ideas, and as adults more often engage in juvenile behaviors and activities.

Other critical beliefs of the juvenile justice system are that the system allows for youth to escape the consequences of their actions. This then leads to further predation of society. This debate centers around the cognitive and moral capacities of juveniles. There have been numerous attempts to conceptualize and organize the abilities needed to be deemed a competent defendant in criminal court.

Competency can be defined as the ability to assist counsel and the ability to engage in proficient reasoning and judgment-making.

To demonstrate proficient reasoning and judgment in court-related matters, a defendant must understand that counsel will provide insight and aid, know when it is beneficial to waive certain rights, and comprehend repercussions of certain options within court proceedings.

It was found in this study that approximately one third of to year-olds and approximately one fifth of 14 to 15 year olds are as impaired in capacities relevant to adjudicative competence as are seriously mentally ill adults who would likely be considered incompetent to stand trial.

A study on mobile county justice system with juvenile and adult offenders

A study that looked exclusively at juveniles 16—17 years old who were directly filed to criminal court i. First, juveniles have less experience in life. They are less likely to perceive risks and less likely to contemplate how present actions might affect their future situations.

These at-risk adolescents are more often subjected to influences from other troublemaking youth, and opposing these influences has the possibility of resulting in poor outcomes, such as being rejected, suffering ridicule or being physically accosted.

Incompetent juveniles are significantly younger than their counterpart competent juveniles, they are more likely to be wards of the state, more likely to be receiving special education services, and more likely to have suffered previous abuse.

Get Legal Information

These beliefs show a lack of juveniles' understanding of one's right against self-incrimination. When comparing juveniles and adults, juveniles are much more likely to refuse to talk to an attorney, even though it is the attorney's duty to help.

When juveniles are asked if they trust their attorney, only 6. In a mock jury study, when looking at a case of a previously maltreated juvenile charged with murder, the juvenile defendant was held at less fault by the jury when she was accused of killing her abuser. The offender's age and level of offense ex.

The older an offender is and the more serious his crime, the more likely the public is willing to transfer him.Criminal Justice Chapter STUDY. PLAY. differences between juvenile and adult system • The primary purpose of juvenile procedures is protection and treatment; with adults, the aim is to punish the guilty • Getting the most serious juvenile offenders off the streets.

The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate.

(May ) (Learn how and when to remove this template message). Inmate News Latest news, organized by topic (below) or region/state (right), concerning a range of issues in the corrections industry. Comments, suggestions and contributions (below) appreciated.

between the adult criminal justice system and the juvenile justice system, for present study purposes, it is worth noting that research on the relationship between the imposition of financial penalties and recidivism in general and among juvenile offenders in particular is noticeably.

Juvenile Vs. Adult Offenders in Mobile County. Juvenile Vs. Adult Offenders in Mobile County In the Mobile County Justice System, a non-violent juvenile inmate is treated very differently from a non-violent adult inmate.

September, Dear Reader, Since its establishment in , The Justice Education Center has conducted extensive offender profile, court disposition and longitudinal studies on the juvenile and adult offender populations in.

Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine